Sources

Adamiak, Richard. “Marx, Engels, and Dühring.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35, no. 1, 1974, pp. 98–112. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2708745.

Bassler, Gerhard P. “The Communist Movement in the German Revolution, 1918-1919: A Problem of Historical Typology?” Central European History, vol. 6, no. 3, 1973, pp. 233–277. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4545673.

Dawson, Christopher, and Robert Royal. “The Significance of Bolshevism.” Enquiries into Religion and Culture (The Works of Christopher Dawson), Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C., 1933, pp. 17–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32b39j.6.

Lih, Lars T. “The Ironic Triumph of Old Bolshevism: The Debates of April 1917 in Context.” Russian History, vol. 38, no. 2, 2011, pp. 199–242. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24665358.

“Posters: World War I Posters: Search Results.” Edited by Library of Congtress, Planning D-Day (April 2003) – Library of Congress Information Bulletin, Victor, 2018, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/wwipos/search/?co=wwipos&q=German%2BBolshevism.

Vettes, William George. “The German Social Democrats and the Eastern Question 1848-1900.” American Slavic and East European Review, vol. 17, no. 1, 1958, pp. 86–100. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3004304.

Weitz, Eric D. “‘Rosa Luxemburg Belongs to Us!” German Communism and the Luxemburg Legacy.” Central European History, vol. 27, no. 1, 1994, pp. 27–64. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4546390.

Leave a comment